ISSN: 2634-1255 | Open Access

Journal of Gynecology Research Reviews & Reports

Sonographic Features in the Placenta Accreta Spectrum

Author(s): Edgar Allan Villagomez Mendoza

Background

Abnormally invasive placenta or placenta accreta is defined as abnormal adherence to the implantation site, that is, to the basal or decidual plate, it is a spectrum of abnormal placentation, caused by a defective formation of the Nitabuch fibrinoid layer, described for the first time. Once by Irving and Hertig in 1937, whose manuscript included complete clinical and histopathological descriptions of 20 cases, where he demonstrated under a microscope, invasive chorionic villi through the uterine wall as interdigitations between fibers and muscle bundles, which indicated that there is a defective basal plate during implantation, Luke et al, in 1960 redefined the terminology to accreta, increta or percreta, according to the placental invasion in histological findings, although the term abnormally adhered placenta refers to the spectrum of anomaly in the insertion placental by abnormal vascularization as a result of an aberrant healing process or causing absence of the fibrinoid layer, characterized by hypoxia itself that triggers decidualization and excessive trophoblastic invasion due to pre-existing damage in the endometrium-myometrium interface [1, 2]. The echographic evaluation in accordance with the risk factors contributes significantly to prenatal diagnosis, which will allow transfer to specialized centers, essential for surgical planning, and thereby modify the maternal outcome, impacting on the reduction of maternal morbidity and mortality

Methodology

Cross-sectional, descriptive study, carried out through a bibliographic review in the databases of PubMed, Scholar.google. com, SciELO, MEDLINE, of articles published in English and Spanish between 1992 and 2020. The following keywords Mesh (Medical Subject Headings): placenta accreta; previous placenta; prenatal diagnosis; abnormally invasive placenta; placenta percreta; abnormally attached placenta. Inclusion criteria: case report-type articles that include pregnant patients with placenta accreta, associated risk factors and diagnostic evaluation sections, as well as a systematic review and meta-analysis on the prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta, whose results were analyzed by analysis of frequency. The initial search in the database provided 50 articles, however, only 42 articles were obtained that included reports on the information required in the inclusion criteria, articles that did not mention risk factors, ultrasound findings or how the procedure was performed were excluded. diagnosis of accreta, 11 systematic reviews and meta-analyses were analyzed with specific evidence of the prevalence of the most frequent risk factors as well as the most prevalent ultrasound findings.

Results

50 articles were analyzed, of which 42 of them met the inclusion criteria, clinical cases of placenta accreta and 11 meta-analyses on prenatal diagnosis were analyzed. Among the risk factors studied, it was observed that 66.7% of the patients had cesarean section as predominant uterine surgery, followed by instrumented uterine curettage in 19%, myomectomy in 4.8%, of the patients 100% had placenta previa , 4.8% uterine myomatosis, assisted reproductive techniques in 9.5% of cases and were achieved through IVF. (Table 1)

Maternal age greater than 35 years was present in 21.4% of the patients, the mean age of the patients was 30.7 years; the most frequent age group in these patients was 30 to 34 years old in 42.9%, followed by 35 and over in 21.4% (Graph 1). Prenatal diagnosis was made in 40% of cases, the findings by ultrasound were the presence of loss of the hypoechoic zone in 35.7%, the presence of placental lacunae in 28.6%, myometrial thinning in 16.7%, as well as disruption of the uterus-bladder interface in 7.1% of patients. Only 2.4% reported with mullerian anomaly, bicornuate uterus and also reported positive serum marker for alpha feto protein. In 54.8%, a transoperative diagnosis was made. (Table 2)

Table 1: Risk Factors

Risk factor N=42 %
Previous placenta 42 100
Caesarean section 28 66.7
Outter graduch instrumentation 8 19
FIV 4 9.5
Uterine myomatosis 2 4.8
Myomectomy 2 4.8
Alpha fetus protein positive 1 2.4
bicornuate uterus 1 2.4

img

Graph 1: Patients According to Age

Table 2: Ultrasound signs

Sonographic signs N=42 %
Loss of hypoechoic area 15 35.7
placental lacunae 12 28.6
slimmingmiometrial <1mm 7 16.7
Disruption of the uterus-bladder interface 3 7.1

Discussion

Maternal death in our country is a public health problem, each year approximately 800 women die due to pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium, of which 22.1% correspond to obstetric hemorrhage, and that prior to covid it was the first cause of maternal death In our country, placental accreta contributes to 33.9% of the maternal morbidity and mortality rate, the latter due to the increase in cesarean section, and which is reflected in the increase in the prevalence of placental accreta almost 10 times in the last 50 years. years, not taking into account risk factors, not requesting auxiliary diagnostic studies such as ultrasound in the deliberate search for placenta accreta, also contributes a fundamental percentage for the development of maternal morbidity and mortality [3,4].

Considering the above, we see that prenatal diagnosis is low, it is described that ultrasound has a sensitivity of 77 to 89% and a specificity of 96-99% for the detection of abnormally invasive placenta, however, in the reported series and comparing the literature, the loss of the hypoechoic zone occurred in 36% of cases versus 70%, myometrial thinning less than 1mm, 17% of patients versus 50%, even in the literature the presence of lacunae is reported as the most common sign placental, in our study it was 28%, the loss of the hypoechoic zone being more common. Currently the literature is enough with systematic reviews and meta-analysis of prenatal diagnosis by ultrasound, diagnostic support with the use of serum markers, even a screening at 11-13 weeks has been reported, in this study it was found that 58% Of the patients, the diagnosis was made during the transoperative period, therefore, the description of the most frequent findings found in the ultrasound will allow the obstetrician and/or the first contact physician to suspect the diagnosis as well as increase timely prenatal diagnosis. raising detection percentages and thereby reducing maternal morbidity and mortality [5].

Conclusion

Placental accreta is an increasingly frequent pathology, the incessant search for alternatives to reduce maternal death, the ultrasound characterization of the most frequent signs help timely prenatal detection [6-38].

References

  1. Irving C, Hertig AT (1937) A study of placenta accreta. Surg Gynecol Obstet 64:
  2. Luke RK, Sharpe JW, Greene RR (1966) Placenta accreta: The adherent or invasive placenta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 95:
  3. Fernndez-Lara JA, Toro-Ortiz JC, Martnez-Trejo Z, De la Maza-Labastida S, Villegas-Arias Mireille-Alexandra (2017) Rate of hemorrhage, obstetric hysterectomy and related maternal death. Ginecol Obstet Mex 85:
  4. Secretary of Health, General Directorate of Epidemiology, relevant information on maternal deaths, in: Maternal Mortality Observatory.
  5. Jauniaux E, Collins S, Burton GJ (2018) Placenta accreta spectrum: pathophysiology and evidence-based anatomy for prenatal ultrasound imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 218:
  6. Jauniaux E, Diogo Ayres-de-Campos, Jens Langhoff-Roos, Karin A. Fox, Sally Collins (2019) FIGO classification for the clinical diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum Int. J. Gynecol. OB 146:
  7. Robert R (2022) Clinical fatures and diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum (placenta accreta, increta and
  8. Wu S, Kocherginsky M, Hibbard JU (2005) Abnormal placentation: Twenty-year analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 192:
  9. Noguera S (2013) Placental accreta a growing Timely diagnosis as successful treatment. Ginecol Obstet Mex 81:
  10. Guadarrama F (2020) Obstetrics and selected topics in fetal medicine, the fetus as patient. First edition. 2020:
  11. Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, et al. (2006) Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 107:
  12. Silver R (2017) Placenta Accreta Syndrome. CRCpress 1:
  13. Jauniaux E, Jurkovic D (2012) Placenta accreta: Pathogenesis of a 20th century iatrogenic uterine disease. Placenta 33:
  14. Tseng J, Min-Min Chou (2006) Differential expression of growth angiogenesis and invasion related factors in the development of placenta accreta. Taiwanese J Obstet Gynecol 45:
  15. Garmi G, Goldman S, Shalev E, Salim R (2011)The effects of decidual injury on the invasion potential of trophoblastic cells. Obstetrics and Gynecology 117:
  16. Tantbirojn P, Crum CP, Parast MM (2008) Pathophysiology of placenta creta: The role of decidua and extravillous trophoblast. Placenta 29:
  17. Goh WA, Zalud I (2016) Placenta accreta: diagnosis, management and the molecular biology of the morbidly adherent placenta. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 29: 1795-
  18. Maher MA, Abdelaziz A, Bazeed MF (2013) Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and MRI in the prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 92:
  19. Bauwens J, Coulon C, Azas H, Bigot J, Houfflin-Debarge V (2014) Placenta accreta : peut-on faire le diagnostic en antnatal ? Apport de lchographie et de lIRM. propos de 27 cas [Placenta accreta: can prenatal diagnosis be performed? Ultrasound and MRI interests. About 27 cases]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 42: 306-311
  20. Zhang C, Liu XY, Fan GS, Yang JQ, Liu JT, et al. (2008) [Clinical analysis of 47 cases of placenta accreta in the second and third trimesters]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 43:
  21. Wang YL, Weng SS, Huang WC (2019) First-trimester abortion complicated with placenta accreta: A systematic review. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 58:
  22. Jauniaux E, Bhide A (2017) Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and outcome of placenta previa accreta after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 217:
  23. Jauniaux E, Collins SL, Jurkovic D, Burton GJ (2016) Accreta placentation: a systematic review of prenatal ultrasound imaging and grading of villous invasiveness. Am J Obstet Gynecol 215:
  24. Chen YJ, Wang PH, Liu WM, Lai CR, Shu LP, et al. (2002) Placenta accreta diagnosed at 9 weeks gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19:
  25. Matsuzaki S, Okada A, Endo M, Nagase Y, Nakagawa S, et al. (2019) Horizontal Cervix as a Novel Sign for Predicting Adhesions on the Posterior Extrauterine Wall in Cases of Placenta Previa. J Clin Med 8:
  26. Ishibashi H, Miyamoto M, Shinnmoto H, Murakami W, Soyama H, et al. (2017) Cervical varicosities may predict placenta accreta in posterior placenta previa: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 296:
  27. Kapoor DS, Tincello DG, Kingston RE (2003) Lifethreatening obstetric haemorrhage in second trimester from a placenta percreta with raised alpha-fetoprotein levels. J Obstet Gynaecol 23:
  28. Ophir E, Tendler R, Odeh M, Khouri S, Oettinger M (1999) Creatine kinase as a biochemical marker in diagnosis of placenta increta and percreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:
  29. Zhou J, Li J, Yan P, Ye YH, Peng W, et al. (2014) Maternal plasma levels of cell-free β-HCG mRNA as a prenatal diagnostic indicator of placenta accrete. Placenta 35:
  30. Shainker SA, Silver RM, Modest AM, Hacker MR, Hecht JL, et al. (2020) Placenta accreta spectrum: biomarker discovery using plasma proteomics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 223:
  31. Smith ZL, Sehgal SS, Van Arsdalen KN, Goldstein IS (2014) Placenta Percreta With Invasion into the Urinary Urol Case Rep 2:
  32. Finberg HJ, Williams JW (1992) Placenta accreta: prospective sonographic diagnosis in patients with placenta previa and prior cesarean section. J Ultrasound Med 11:
  33. Wang Y, Gao Y, Zhao Y, Chong Y, Chen Y (2018) Ultrasonographic diagnosis of severe placental invasion. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 44:
  34. Collins SL, Ashcroft A, Braun T, Calda P, Langhoff-Roos J, et al. (2016) European Working Group on Abnormally Invasive Placenta (EW-AIP). Proposal for standardized ultrasound descriptors of abnormally invasive placenta (AIP). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 47:
  35. Jauniaux E, Bhide A, Kennedy A, Woodward P, Hubinont C, et al. (2018) FIGO Placenta Accreta Diagnosis and Management Expert Consensus Panel. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: Prenatal diagnosis and screening. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 140:
  36. Panaiotova J, Tokunaka M, Krajewska K, Zosmer N, Nicolaides KH (2019) Screening for morbidly adherent placenta in early pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 53:
  37. Villagomez A, Alejandra Gomez-Fernandez, Israel OrozcoGutierrez (2018) Ruptura uterina e invasin trofoblstica a la vejiga. Reporte de un caso. Ginecol Obstet Mex 86:
  38. Chu C, Zhao S, Ding M, Liu M, Zhang Y,et al. (2019) Combining Clinical Characteristics and Specific Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features to Predict Placenta Accreta. J Comput Assist Tomogr 43: 775-779.
View PDF