ISSN: 2635-2826 | Open Access

Journal of Clinical & Biomedical Research

Complex Treatment for Analaplastic G3 Meningioma- Clinical Case with Literature Review

Author(s): Lena Marinova*, Vaska Vassileva, Viktor Petrov, Iliya Gabrovski and Galin Vulchev

Abstract

Anaplastic meningiomas are rare aggressive brain neoplasms that are followed by recurrences, despite a gross total surgery.
We present a 45-year-old woman with an anaplastic meningioma recurrence two years after surgery, which is not followed by postoperative raditherapy. Through this clinical case, we emphasize the required diagnostics and complex treatment in analaplastic meningiomas as well as the current optimization options of imposing surgical intervention, radiotherapy and drug treatment.
?he standard care is maximum safe resection followed by adjuvant raditherapy (RT) for grade 3 meningiomas. Radiosurgery (RS) is an effective therapeutic alternative for intracranial and spinal meningiomas up to 3.5 cm. Hypofractionated radiosurgery (HFRS) is administered postoperatively in analaplastic meningiomas with a diameter of more than 3.5 cm. After re-operation of recurrences and after 6 months of the previous radiotherapy, it is possible to conduct HFRS re-irradiation, followed by targeted therapy.

Introduction

The meningiomas are extraaxial brain tumors originating in the upper layer of meningo-endothelial arachnoid cells. Supratentorial intracranial meningiomas are most commonly diagnosed [1]. Although most meningiomas are benign (80%) and slow-growing, atypical (15-20%) and anaplastic (1-3%) meningiomas are more aggressive with a tendency to recurrence, worse clinical outcomes, and higher disease-specific mortality [2-6]. WHO 2016 definition of anaplastic meningiomas is a meningioma that exhibits overtly malignant cytology (resembling that of carcinoma, melanoma or high grade sarcoma) or markedly elevated mitotic activity [7]. Through the clinical case with an anaplastic meningioma recurrence two years after surgery, we emphasize the required diagnostics and complex treatment in analaplastic meningiomas as well as the current optimization options of imposing surgical intervention, radiotherapy and drug treatment.

Clinical Case

We present a 45-year-old woman with a relapse of anaplastic G3 meningioma. On the occasion of a stubborn headache in November 2017, imaging studies and brain MRT were conducted, which establish a right temporal brain tumor (Figure 1). On December 7, 2017, visibly total tumor resection and pathohistologically verified as anaplastic meningioma / G3 was performed. Intraoperative description - Subdural found a core of a greyish and licked brain tumor as well as a large cyst on the right reaching the lateral ventricle. Immunohistochemical analysis - Ki67-3 + (> 30%) - high proliferative activity; 100% expression to Vimentin; CK AE1 / AE3 - missing expression. The patient is not targeted for postoperative radiotherapy. On Control CT / April 2018- The famous cystic zone was visualized to a right temporally pulling the rear edge of the right lateral ventricle, that wass taken as a post-operative cyst. During the beginning of 2020, the headache recovered MRT / May 2020. establishes recurrent tumor mass data in the operative bed (Figure.2) and from MRT /October 2020, the recurrent lesion is increased by 32.5 mm/18mm (Figure.3). On 28.10.20 re-surgery of tumor relapse was performed. Postoperative intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using the VMAT in the volume of the tumor bed with 2 cm insurance zone with daily dose (DD) 2 Gy up to total dose (TD) 58 Gy (Figure.4) was performed. After 1 year of radiotherapy, the patient is without relapse, with good quality of life and without neurological symptoms.

img

Figure 1: Brain CT / November 2017 of a brain tumor on the right temporal with expressed perifocal edema and the dislocation of the medium brain line

img

Figure 2: Brain MRI / May 2020- Recurrent temporal tumor in the volume of the previous surgery via December 2017

img

Figure 3: Brain MRI / October 2020 - A/ Increased brain lesion with a diameter of 32.5 mm / 18mm in comparisons with MR image in May 2020, with irregular tumor borders, heterogenous tumoral enhancement and perifocal vasogenic edema; B/ Postoperative pelvis MRI / March /2012- Residual sacral chordoma with progression in size and expansion to the right gluteal muscles (27).

img

Figure 4: Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using the VMAT in the volume of the tumor bed with 2 cm insurance zone with daily dose 2 Gy up to total dose 58 Gy.

Discussion

Meningiomas are characterized by a diverse pathohistological characteristic and different mitotic activity. Benign G1 meningeomas are diagnosed in 90% such as meningo-endothelial, fibrous, transient, psamomatous, angioblastic/ mostly aggressive; Atypical G2 meningeomas in 7% - choroidal, clear cell, atypical / infiltrating brain; Anaplastic malignant G3 meningeomas in 2% - papillary, rabdoid, analaplastic [1, 8]. The clear cell and chordoid subtypes are also considered atypical [3, 4, 9]. In 2007, the WHO criteria were further modified to remove the automatic classification of tumors with brain invasion into the grade 3 category, thereby further increasing the proportion of grade 2 to the range 20%-35% [10]. Grade III (anaplastic) meningiomas exhibit histologic features of overt malignancy, including high mitotic activity (20 or more mitotic figures per 10 high power microscope fields), frank anaplasia with focal, or diffuse loss of meningothelial differentiation, and their cytology often resembles carcinoma, sarcoma, or melanoma [11]. Atypical and anaplastic meningiomas occur more frequently over the cerebral convexities than at the skull base. When these high grade meningiomas occur at the skull base, they have lower recurrence rates and better overall prognosis than similar tumors found over the convexities [12, 13]. High levels of progesterone receptors are associated with favorable prognosis, whereas meningiomas with loss or absence of progesterone receptors tend to be more aggressive with increased rates of recurrence [14-18]. Distant metastases from meningiomas are extremely rare, occurring in an estimated 0.1% of meningiomas and almost always in association with very large intracranial tumours [19]. Tumor cells may pass the bloodbrain barrier and metastasize into the lung, liver and bones [1]. The overall and disease-free survival are directly dependent on the mitotic cell activity of G2 and G3-meningeoms, respectively 11.9 years / 3.3 years and 11,5 years / 2.7 years [8]. For higher grade tumours, in the US National Cancer Database (1985-1992), five year overall survival rates of 75% for atypical (grade 2) and 55% for malignant (grade 3) meningiomas were recorded [20].

Difficult Differential Diagnosis (DD) in the like pathochistological characteristics of cranial extraosal Ewing sarcoma / pPNET, carcinomeningioma, analaplastic G3-meningioma, atypical G2-meningioma and hemangiopericitoma requires immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis [8]. The phenotypical malignant transformation of meningial tumor cells from classic atypical meningioma is characterized by intermediate filament protein, prominent by increased expression of GFAP, vitamin, alpha-internexin, neurofilament protein (NFP), desmin and keratin [21]. P53 is believed to have a significant role in the pathogenesis of meningosarcoma [22]. Intermediate fylamen protein is a normal finding during central embryogenesis. The malignant progression of the meningioma cells reduces the expression of EMA and cell metaplasia increases alpha-internexin and NFR. IHC-analyzes determine claudin-1 for a specific marker in atypical meningioma [23]. IHC in the analaplastic G3 meningioma / meningosarcoma reports a positive membrane reaction to CD34, Ki 67- 3+ (> 30%) - high proliferative activity, 100% expression to Vimentin; negative expression to CK AE1 / AE3 [7]. In addition to the aforementioned WHO criteria, the mouse intestinal bacteria 1 (MIB-1) proliferation index is a histopathological biomarker that is associated with higher recurrence rates in meningiomas [24]. In the presented clinical case, IHC analysis reports Ki67 > 30%- high proliferative activity; 100% expression to Vimentin and negative expression of CK AE1 / AE3. The lack of expression of CK AE1 / AE3 sharply distinguishes this lesion from carcinoma neoplasms. Interesting is DD of chordoid subtypes meningiomas, which diagnose <1% of all meningiomas, and chordomas that are axially located brain tumors. These meningiomas are called “chordoid” because it resembles a chordoma, with cords or trabeculae of epithelioid cells that may be eosinophilic or clear. Chordomas are characterized by positive IHC expression to Cytokeratin and EMA, while chordoid subtypes meningeomas are negative to Cytokeratin but positive to EMA [25]. MRI features that may be associated with higher grade meningiomas include markedly irregular tumour margins, irregular nodules, a mushrooming pattern and inhomogeneous enhancement [26]. In the presented clinical case MR image of relapse, namely irregular tumor borders, heterogenous tumoral enhancement and peritumoral edema (Figure.2, Figure.3/A), resembles the MR image of chordoma (Figure.3/B) [27].

Treatment of Intracranial Meningiomas is imposed in progressive or rapidly explained neurological symptoms. Surgical treatment includes a radical operation along with the infiltrated soft brain shell and bone [28-30]. Gross total resection (GTR) is the preferred primary treatment, and this can be further classified into Simpson grades 1-3 (G1-G3) resection, where G1 resection removes tumor, underlying bone, and dura, G2 resection removes tumor and coagulates the attached dura, and G3 resection removes tumor but leaves the dura intact [31]. The standard of care is maximum safe resection followed by adjuvant radiation for grade III and incompletely resected grade II meningiomas [11]. Practice shows a direct relationship between the volume of surgery and the risk of relapse [29]. GTR plus adjuvant radiation for malignant meningiomas has been shown to independently predict improved disease-free and overall survival times - five-year disease-free survival improved from 15% without radiation to 80% with adjuvant radiation [32]. After a macroscopic radical resection, including the brain shell with the infiltrated bone, the level of recurrences reached 10% after coagulation up to 20%, and after partial resection - up to 74% [4, 5, 33, 34]. The meningiomas localized in the sphenoidal area, as well as parasagittal are most commonly recurrent, due to gross surgical removal difficulties. The rare meningiomas of the cavernous sinus, tentorium and cerebellopontine angle are extremely difficult for radical operation due to postoperative severe neurological and sensory deficits [2]. Following complete resection, the 5-year recurrence rate is 29-58% for atypical and 72-94% for anaplastic meningiomas [5, 35, 36]. Literature published since the WHO 2000 classification report higher recurrence rates at five years following surgical excision for WHO grade II (41%) and III (70-91%) than for WHO grade I lesions (3%) [37-39]. Non-skull base location, male gender, and prior surgery are all independent pre-operative risk factors for WHO grade II or III meningiomas. This increased risk translates to probable poorer prognosis and increased likelihood of recurrence after treatment [16]. Patients with subtotal resection/ Simpson grade IV resection, who received RT had fewer recurrences and higher PFS compared to those who did not. 3-yr OS was equivalent in both G2 and G3 tumors with and without RT. G3 histology and Simpson grade were predictive for relapse while brain invasion, mitoses, adjuvant RT, and location of tumor were not [31]. The Simpson grade of meningioma resection was described in 1957 and correlated the degree of surgical resection completeness with symptomatic recurrence [40]. Risk of recurrence was similar after grade I and II resections, tended to increase after grade III (HR: 2.35; p = .087) but was higher after grade IV resections (HR: 7.35; p = .003) [41].

Radiotherapy (RT) is an effective and generally well-tolerated treatment for meningiomas. Based on evidence in the literature, adjuvant radiation is usually recommended for atypical meningiomas following incomplete resection, for anaplastic meningiomas regardless of the extent of resection, and for recurrent meningiomas [42-44]. Post-operative RT is standard due to a high level of recurrence at G3-meningiomas [45]. In the presented clinical case, an anaplastic meningioma was diagnosed after 2.5 years of diagnostics and first surgery. The patient has not conducted postoperative RT, which is an omission in the complex treatment and the main reason for the relapse (Figure.2, Figure.3/A. Maire JP et al., Report a good radiotherapeutic effect after partial tumor resection in relapses, inoperable meningiomas and analaplastic, aggressively growing tumors, despite the maximum radical surgery [46]. A more pronounced radiosensibility of partially resected meningiomas compared to recurrences was observed [28, 47]. RT is the treatment choice when meningiomas are considered as unresectable either due to tumour location (most commonly in close proximity to the optic apparatus or in the skull base) or when the patient requires treatment but is not suitable for surgery [48]. In the past 10 years, the role of radiosurgery (RS) in the meningiomas was reported [49-53]. RS delivers a single high dose is generally used in atypical and anaplastic meningiomas with residual or recurrent disease. Treatment doses typically range from 12 to 20 Gy [54-56]. Displayed for RS are meningiomas with dimensions up to 3.5 cm, localized to 5 mm from the optic nerve or chiasm, with good accumulation of CT or MRT contrast [57]. Stereotaxic RS is administered to patients with surgery contraindications with comorbidity or elderly [51, 58, 59]. After the realization of RS with high single fractions, there were no late radical effects involving dementia or secondary radioinduced tumors [60]. Risk factors associated with developing perilesional edema ranging from 2.5 to 50% include prior radiation treatment, larger tumor volume, higher tumor grade, and parasagittal location [61, 62]. In meningiomas with a larger volume and a diameter of more than 3.5 cm, it is possible to conduct a hypophractioned RS by which high radiation doses of 15-35 Gy over 3-6 fractions [63, 64]. Subsequently, fractionated stereotaxic RT for inoperable meningiomas or for patients with comorbidity was introduced [65]. A phase II trial of IMRT administered radiation doses ranging from 54 to 60 Gy in 30 fractions for treatment of incompletely resected atypical meningiomas, anaplastic meningiomas regardless of extent of resection, and recurrent meningiomas [11]. Pirzkall et al. compared conformal and IMRT plans used in nine patients and showed that the IMRT technique increased dose and target coverage while sparing OAR [66]. Re-irradiation with photons is challenging due to the surrounding healthy tissue’s limited tolerance to more radiation; however, particle therapy has been described as safe and effective for re-irradiation in recurrent or progressive meningiomas [67]. Due to the large volume of post-operative tumor bed, in the recurrent anaplastic mengioma, we conducted the IMRT using the VMAT method with a 1cm insurance area with DD 2 Gy up to TD 58 Gy (Figure.4). The patient suffered well, without early radiation effects. After 1 year of RT, the patient is without relapse, with good quality of life and without neurological symptoms. Despite surgery and RT, in recurrent and aggressively growing meningiomas, hydroxyurea has been imposed [1, 68]. Several studies using bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against the VEGF receptor, have reported mild improvement in PFS in patients with recurrent meningiomas [69-71]. In phase II clinical trials of sunitinib for recurrent and progressive atypical and anaplastic meningiomas, there was a PFS of 42% at 6 months, which was an improvement from reported natural history PFS of 5-30% at 6 months [72].

Conclusion

Anaplastic meningiomas are diagnosed in 1% to 3% of all meningioma lesions. Their differential diagnosis requires a strict pathohistological study with immunohistochemical analysis. MR image of relapse, namely irregular tumor borders, heterogenous tumoral enhancement and peritumoral edema, resembles the MR image of chordoma. The standard care is maximum safe resection followed by adjuvant RT for grade 3 meningiomas. Radiosurgery is an effective therapeutic alternative for intracranial and spinal meningiomas up to 3.5 cm. Hypofractionated radiosurgery is administered postoperatively in analaplastic menangiomas with a diameter of more than 3.5 cm. After re-operation of recurrences and after 6 months of the previous radiotherapy, it is possible to conduct HFRS re-irradiation, followed by targeted therapy

References

  1. . Jeffrey Raizer (2010) Meningiomas. Current Treatment Options in Neurology 2: 360-368
  2. Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Xu J, Kromer C, Wolinsky Y, et al. (2016) CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2009-2013. Neurooncology 18: 71-75.
  3. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, et al. (2007) The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol 114: 97-109.
  4. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, Von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, et al. (2016) The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 131: 803-820
  5. Perry A (2004) Unmasking the secrets of meningioma: a slow but rewarding journey. Surg Neuro 61: 171-173.
  6. Rogers L, Gilbert M, Vogelbaum MA (2010) Intracranial meningiomas of atypical (WHO grade II) histology. J Neurooncol 99: 393-405
  7. Kresak J (2022) Anaplastic meningioma. PathologyOutlines. com website. https://www.pathologyoutlines.com/topic/ cnstumoranaplasticmeningioma.html.
  8. . Yang SY, C-K Park, S-H Park, DG Kim, YS Chung, et al. (2008) Atypical and anaplastic meningiomas: prognostic implications of clinicopathological features. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 79: 574-580
  9. . Prayson R (2012) Neuropathology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders 513-560-p.
  10. . Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, et al. (2007) The WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol 114: 97-109.
  11. Taylor Anne Wilson, Lei Huang, Dinesh Ramanathan (2020) Review of Atypical and Anaplastic Meningiomas: Classification, Molecular Biology, and Management. Front Oncol 10: 565-582.
  12. . Liang R-F, Xiu Y-J, Wang X, Li M, Yang Y, et al. (2014) the potential risk factors for atypical and anaplastic meningiomas: clinical series of 1,239 cases. Int J Clin Exp Med 7: 5696- 5700.
  13. Magill ST, Young JS, Chae R, Aghi MK (2018) Theodosopoulos PV, McDermott MW. Relationship between tumor location, size, and WHO grade in meningioma. Neurosurg Focus 44: E4-p.
  14. Rohringer M, Sutherland GR, Louw DF, Sima AA (1989) Incidence and clinicopathological features of meningioma. J Neurosurg 71: 665-672.
  15. . Hsu DW, Efird JT, Hedley-Whyte ET (1997) Progesterone and estrogen receptors in meningiomas: prognostic considerations. J Neurosurg 86: 113-120.
  16. . Kane AJ, Sughrue ME, Rutkowski MJ, Shangari G, Fang S, et al. (2011) Anatomic location is a risk factor for atypical and malignant meningiomas. Cancer 117: 1272-1278.
  17. . Mahmood A, Caccamo DV, Tomecek FJ, Malik GM (1993) Atypical and malignant meningiomas: a clinicopathological review. Neurosurgery 33: 955-963.
  18. Pravdenkova S, Al-Mefty O, Sawyer J, Husain M (2006) Progesterone and estrogen receptors: opposing prognostic indicators in meningiomas. J Neurosurg 105: 163-173
  19. Abboud M, Haddad G, Kattar M, Aburiziq I, Geara FB, et al. (2009) extraneural metastases from cranial meningioma: a case report. Radiation oncology (London, England) 4: 1-20.
  20. McCarthy BJ, Davis FG, Freels S, Surawicz TS, Damek DM, et al. (1998) Factors associated with survival in patients with meningioma. Journal of neurosurgery 88: 831-839.
  21. Pérez-Guiones Bacete M, Cerda-Nicolás M, Piquer J, BarciaMariño C (1992) Meningiomas: immunohistochemical analysis of 26 cases.Arch Neurobiol (Madr) 55: 43-49
  22. Wrobel G, Roerig P, Kokocinski F (2005) Microarraybased gene expression profiling of benign, atypical and anaplastic meningiomas identifies novel genes associated with meningioma progression. Int. J. Cancer 114: 249-256.
  23. Hahn HP, Bundock EA, Hornick JL (2006) Immunohistochemical staining for claudin-1 can help distinguish meningiomas from histologic mimics. Am J Clin Pathol 125: 203-208
  24. Cobb MA, Husain M, Andersen BJ, al-Mefty O (1996) Significance of proliferating cell nuclear antigen in predicting recurrence of intracranial meningioma. J Neurosurg 84: 85-90.
  25. . Kresak J, Yachnis A (2022) Chordoid meningioma. PathologyOutlines.com website. https://www. pathologyoutlines.com/ topic/cnstumorchordoidmeningioma. html
  26. . Tanaka Y, Matsuo M (1996) Role of MR imaging in the differentiation of benign and nonbenign intracranial meningiomas: the utility of contrast-enhanced T1weighted images]. Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai zasshi Nippon acta radiologica 56: 1-8
  27. Lena Marinova, Radoslav Georgiev, Nikolay Evgeniev (2020) Clinical observation in three clinical cases with locally advanced chordomas. What is needed for early diagnosis with improved survival? Journal of Clinical Images and Medical Case Reports V-11.
  28. . Goldsmith BJ, Wara WM, Wilson CB (1994) Postoperative irradiation for subtotally resected meningiomas. A retrospective analysis of 140 patients treated from 1967 to 1990. J Neurosurg 80: 195-201.
  29. . Haddad G, Al-Mefty O (1996) Meningiomas: an overview, in Wilkins RH, Rengachary SS (eds): Neurosurgery, ed 2. New York: McGraw-Hill 833-841-p.
  30. Ojemann R. Meningiomas (1990) Neurosurg Clin North Am 1: 181-197
  31. Simpson D (1957) the recurrence of intracranial meningiomas after surgical treatment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 20: 22-39.
  32. Dziuk TW, Woo S, Butler EB (1998) malignant meningioma: an indication for initial aggressive surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy. Journal of neuro-oncology 37: 177-188.
  33. Carella RJ, Ransohoff J, Newall J (1982) Role of radiation therapy in the management of meningioma. Neurosurgery 10: 332-339
  34. . Wara WM (1985) Radiation therapy for brain tumors. Cancer 55: 2291-2295.
  35. Buerki RA, Horbinski CM, Kruser T (2018) an overview of meningiomas. Future Oncol 14: 2161-2177
  36. . Graffeo CS, Leeper HE, Perry A (2017) Revisiting adjuvant radiotherapy after gross total resection of World Health Organization grade II meningioma. World Neurosurg 103: 655-663
  37. Aghi MK, Carter BS, Cosgrove GR, Ojemann RG, AminHanjani S, et al. (2009) Long-term recurrence rates of atypical meningiomas after gross total resection with or without postoperative adjuvant radiation. Neurosurgery 64: 56-60.
  38. . Nakasu S, Fukami T, Jito J, Nozaki K (2009) Recurrence and regrowth of benign meningiomas. Brain Tumor Pathol 26: 69-72.
  39. . Yang SY, Park CK, Park SH, Kim DG, Chung YS, et al. (2008) Atypical and anaplastic meningiomas: prognostic implications of clinicopathological features. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 79: 574-580
  40. . Hannah Yoon , Irene B Helenowski , Karthikeyan Perumal, MaryAnne H Marymont, James Chandler, et al. (2013) Prognostic factors and outcome of atypical and anaplastic meningioma with and without radiation. Journal of Clinical Oncology 31-v
  41. Kira Marie Voβ, Dorothee Cäcilia Spille, Cristina Sauerland (2017) The Simpson grading in meningioma surgery: does the tumor location influence the prognostic value? J Neurooncol 133: 641-651
  42. . Cho M, Joo J-D, Kim IA, Jung Ho Han, Chang Wan Oh, et al. (2017) The role of adjuvant treatment in patients with highgrade meningioma. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 60: 527-533
  43. . Goldbrunner R, Minniti G, Preusser M, Michael D Jenkinson, Kita Sallabanda, et al. (2016) EANO guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of meningiomas. Lancet Oncol 17: 383-391.
  44. Wang Y-C, Chuang C-C, Wei K-C, Cheng-Nen Chang, ShihTseng Lee, et al. (2016) Long term surgical outcome and prognostic factors of atypical and malignant meningiomas. Sci Rep 6: 35743.
  45. Goyal LK, Suh JH, Mohan DS, Richard A Prayson, Joung Lee, et al. (2000) Local control and overall survival in atypical meningioma: a retrospective study, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 46: 57-61.
  46. Goldsmith BJ, WM Wara, CB Wilson, DA Larson (1994) Postoperative irradiation for subtotally resected meningiomas. A retrospective analysis of 140 patients treated from 1967 to 1990. J Neurosurg 80: 195-201.
  47. Maire JP, Caudry M, Guerin J (1995) Fractioned radiation therapy in the treatment of intracranial meningiomas: local control, functional efficacy, and tolerance in 91 patients. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys 33: 315321.
  48. Viani GA, da Silva LG, Stefano EJ (2012) Prognostic indexes for brain metastases: which is the most powerful? International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 83: 325-330.
  49. . Engenhart R, Kimmig BN, Hover KH, B Wowra, V Sturm, et al. (1990) Stereotactic single high dose radiation therapy of benign intracranial meningiomas. Intl J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 19: 1021-1026.
  50. . Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD, Coffey RJ (1991) Gamma knife radiosurgery of meningiomas. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 57: 11-21.
  51. Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD, Coffey RJ (1991) Stereotactic radiosurgery of meningiomas. J Neurosurg 74: 552-559.
  52. . Lunsford LD, Flickinger J, Coffey RJ (1990) Stereotactic gamma knife radiosurgery. Initial North American experience in 207 patients. Arch Neurol 47: 169-175
  53. Lunsford LD, Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC (1993) Stereotactic radiosurgery for benign intracranial tumors. Clin Neurosurg 40: 475-497
  54. Attia A, Chan MD, Mott RT, Greg B Russell, David Seif, et al. (2012) Patterns of failure after treatment of atypical meningioma with gamma knife radiosurgery. J Neurooncol 108: 179-185.
  55. . Harris AE, Lee JYK, Omalu B, Flickinger JC (2003) the effect of radiosurgery during management of aggressive meningiomas. Surg Neurol 60: 298-305.
  56. . Huffmann BC, Reinacher PC, Gilsbach JM (2005) Gamma knife surgery for atypical meningiomas. J Neurosurg 102: 283-286.
  57. Aurelia Kollová, Roman Liscák, Josef Novotný Jr, Vilibald Vladyka, Gabriela Simonová, et al. (2007) Gamma Knife surgery for benign meningioma. J Neurosurg 107: 325-336
  58. Bakay RA (1992) Stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of brain tumors. Clin Neurosurg 39: 292-313.
  59. Mehta MP (1995) The physical, biologic, and clinical basis of radiosurgery. Curr Prob Cancer 19: 265-329
  60. Lindquist C, Steiner L (1996) Radiosurgery for Tumors, in Wilkins RH, Rengachary SS (eds): Neurosurgery, ed 2. New York: McGraw-Hill 1887-1907-p.
  61. Kuhn EN, Taksler GB, Dayton O, Loganathan A, Bourland D, et al. (2014) is there a tumor volume threshold for postradiosurgical symptoms? A single-institution analysis. Neurosurgery 75: 536-545
  62. . Prasad RN, Breneman JC, Struve T, Ronald E Warnick, Luke E Pater, et al. (2018) Linac-based fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for high-risk meningioma. J Radiosurg SBRT 5: 269-276
  63. Morimoto M, Yoshioka Y, Shiomi H, Fumiaki Isohashi, Koji Konishi, et al. (2011) Significance of tumor volume related to peritumoral edema in intracranial meningioma treated with extreme hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy in three to five fractions. Jpn J Clin Oncol 41: 609-616
  64. . Oermann EK, Bhandari R, Chen VJ, Gabriel Lebec, Marie Gurka, et al. (2013) Five fraction image-guided radiosurgery for primary and recurrent meningiomas. Front Oncol 1-7-p.
  65. . Gademann G, Schlegel W, Debus J (1993) Fractionated stereotactically guided radiotherapy of head and neck tumors: a report on clinical use of a new system in 195 cases. Radiother Oncol 29: 205-213
  66. Pirzkall A, Debus J, Haering P, Karl-Heinz Grosser, Angelika Höss, et al. (2003) Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for recurrent, residual, or untreated skull-base meningiomas: preliminary clinical experience. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 55: 362-372
  67. El Shafie RA, Czech M, Kessel KA, Daniel Habermehl, Dorothea Weber, et al. (2018) Evaluation of particle radiotherapy for the re-irradiation of recurrent intracranial meningioma. Radiat Oncol 13: 86
  68. Newton HB (2007) Hydroxyurea chemotherapy in the treatment of meningiomas. Neurosurg Focus 23: E11
  69. . Franke AJ, Skelton WP, Woody LE, Amade Bregy, Ashish H Shah, et al. (2018) Role of bevacizumab for treatmentrefractory meningiomas: A systematic analysis and literature review. Surg Neurol Int 9: 133.
  70. Lou E, Sumrall AL, Turner S, Katherine B Peters, Annick Desjardins, et al. (2012) Bevacizumab therapy for adults with recurrent/progressive meningioma: a retrospective series. J Neurooncol 109: 63-70
  71. Nayak L, Iwamoto FM, Rudnick JD, Andrew D Norden, Eudocia Quant Lee, et al. (2012) Atypical and anaplastic meningiomas treated with bevacizumab. J Neurooncol 109: 187-193.
  72. 72. Kaley TJ, Wen P, Schiff D, David Schiff, Keith Ligon, et al. (2015) Phase II trial of sunitinib for recurrent and progressive atypical and anaplastic meningioma. Neurooncology 17: 116-121
View PDF