Author(s): Krupa Goel
The amount of pressure that tenants are experiencing to make timely rent payments has also influenced the need for flexible rent payment solutions. The conventional rental structures where tenets are expected to remit rent in full on the first of every month are also partial since many renters have irregular income patterns, such as those paid biweekly or weekly. These gaps have been further amplified by actionable factors such as the increase in living standards, volatility of income, and contract work. Analyses like the one conducted at the Joint Center for Housing Studies at Harvard show that most renters are "cost-burdened," paying more than 30% of their income on rent. This article also covers renters' financial vulnerability, including unstable income, disharmonization pay cycle, and sanctions for delayed rent, such as credit history deterioration, eviction, and damaged relations with a landlord. The discussion continues regarding the current payment solutions, such as third-party apps, auto-payments, and payment methods proposed by the landlord, with the pros and cons highlighted. Subsequently, the ability of flexible payment systems to mitigate tenants' cash stresses and prevent eviction is evaluated. The article also discusses the possibilities of future trends in rent payment flexibility, such as new technological advancements, implementation of subscription-based services, and changes in policies that can foster the improved utilization of flexibility in payment. Finally, tenants and landlords are given guidelines to guide individuals in the changing structure of rent payment choices and enhance living conditions.
View PDF